A Personal ArchiveThe Ishmael Record

Back to the Record
Tax & Fiscal Policy

Don't Bash Tax Cuts, Then Cite Freightquote And Applebee's As Missouri 'Wins'

By Patrick Ishmael Filed June 20, 2013 Source Show-Me Institute

Last week, Kansas City Week in Review had a fascinating segment about the economics and politics of Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon's tax cut veto. Among other things, the panelists talked a little bit about the "victories" each side of the Kansas-Missouri economic border war had experienced in recent years. Kansas City Star reporter Kevin Collison specifically cited two Missouri "wins" — Freightquote and Applebee's.

Well, you know, Missouri has gotten a few major wins, too. Freightquote, a major firm, is going to be moving into their new space on the Missouri side of the border. There has certainly been a lot — Applebee's came over here. Kansas has had an edge…

As we've noted here before, both Freightquote ($60-plus million) and Applebee's ($10-plus million) were promised massive tax incentive packages to get them to move into Missouri. That's remarkable for one big reason: For all the hand-wringing about how disastrous tax cuts would be, it is ironic and hilarious that the very "wins" Collison and others cite in support of the status quo are themselves . . . extremely targeted tax cuts. What else would you call reducing the tax burden for a few businesses?

A better policy, based in the literature, would be to reduce taxes for everyone. Why Collison and others would support special tax breaks for the favored few, and then deny tax relief for millions of others, is strange, unfortunate, and wrong.

View the original at Show-Me Institute →

Source & Reproduction Notice

As confirmed against the Show-Me Institute's website on August 15, 2026, the Institute's stated policy permits reprinting of its published articles and commentary provided the original author receives credit. Letting the Institute know about a reprint is appreciated but is not a condition of use.

This entry was archived under that permission as it stood on the date above. If the Institute's policy changes after that date, it does not apply retroactively to entries already reproduced here under the terms in effect at the time — this is a record of the grant as confirmed, not a live status check.

The original remains hosted at the Institute's own site — use the link below for the canonical version, current formatting, and any images.