A Personal ArchiveThe Ishmael Record

Back to the Record
Tax & Fiscal Policy

Ignore the Gimmicks. Here Are the Reasons Amazon Should Come to Missouri.

By Patrick Ishmael Filed November 2, 2017 Source Show-Me Institute

My colleague Patrick Tuohey has talked at length about the stunts some have pulled to try and get Amazon to bring its second headquarters, or "HQ2," to Missouri. That silliness, paired with the tax incentives that almost certainly accompany both Kansas City's and Saint Louis's Amazon proposals, give off a whiff of desperation—desperation that, frankly, is warranted for some politicians, but unwarranted with regard to the fundamentals of the regions themselves.

I also take exception to the Coastal notion that our cities are flatly uncompetitive, and the specific suggestion that Saint Louis is some charity case. In fact, there are very strong business cases for Amazon to consider both Kansas City and Saint Louis that have nothing to do with charity. And with respect, if Amazon doesn't recognize and exploit those advantages, other companies will.

Make no mistake: I would love to see Amazon come to Kansas City and/or Saint Louis, and Show-Me Institute analysts have written about the advantages that Missouri's biggest cities bring to the table for literally years now.

This isn't to gloss over the cities' problems, either, whether it be crime, governmental mismanagement, regressive taxation, or a whole host of other issues discussed on this site in the past. Too often city and state leaders try to hit home runs with tax incentives and paper-thin kabuki PR campaigns to compensate for the fact that they don't consistently hit the singles and doubles that actually lead to economic wins—keeping residents safe, maintaining infrastructure, treating businesses fairly, and the like.

But no city, anywhere, is perfect; all cities fall short at times, and the process of local government reform and improvement is a continual effort.

What Kansas City and Saint Louis are world-class at—intermodality, centrality, cost, and livability—accentuate the fact that both cities, jointly and separately, should be in Amazon's final conversations about advantageous sites. Two terrific papers written for SMI by Wendell Cox (the most recent being Kansas City's, published last year) reiterate this truth.

Whether Amazon comes to Missouri certainly remains to be seen, and the odds are against it. But win or lose, Kansas City, Saint Louis, and Missouri have a lot to offer to Amazon and companies like it, now and in the future. It's those advantages that will direct these cities' success going forward—not Amazon, not tax incentives, and certainly not political gimmicks.

View the original at Show-Me Institute →

Source & Reproduction Notice

As confirmed against the Show-Me Institute's website on August 15, 2026, the Institute's stated policy permits reprinting of its published articles and commentary provided the original author receives credit. Letting the Institute know about a reprint is appreciated but is not a condition of use.

This entry was archived under that permission as it stood on the date above. If the Institute's policy changes after that date, it does not apply retroactively to entries already reproduced here under the terms in effect at the time — this is a record of the grant as confirmed, not a live status check.

The original remains hosted at the Institute's own site — use the link below for the canonical version, current formatting, and any images.