A Personal ArchiveThe Ishmael Record

Back to the Record
Health Care Policy

No, The Volunteer Health Services Act Didn't Offer 'Blanket Immunity' To Out-of-State Doctors

By Patrick Ishmael Filed August 6, 2013 Source Show-Me Institute

Just before the Fourth of July holiday, Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon vetoed the Volunteer Health Services Act. The legislation — which would have allowed out-of-state health professionals to more easily offer free care to needy Missourians — was criticized in Nixon's veto message for creating "blanket immunity" for such doctors.

Just one problem with that claim: it's not true. Don't believe this lawyer? How about . . . the Missouri Association of Trial Attorneys?

Sharon Jones, deputy director of the Missouri Association of Trial Attorneys, which initially opposed the bill, said "even in times of emergency people need to be careful and they need to be responsible. If you harm someone, you should still be held responsible for the harm that you've caused."

But the bill doesn't actually grant blanket immunity. Trial lawyers stopped actively working against the legislation after language was added providing for civil penalties if health workers engage in "willful misconduct" or a "gross deviation from the ordinary standard of care," Jones said.

What a disaster. Assuming the governor wrote his veto message, there is now a serious question about whether he read the bill before he killed it. Does he stand by his veto message? And the big question now with the upcoming veto session is, will the bill stay dead, or will the veto be overridden?

View the original at Show-Me Institute →

Source & Reproduction Notice

As confirmed against the Show-Me Institute's website on August 15, 2026, the Institute's stated policy permits reprinting of its published articles and commentary provided the original author receives credit. Letting the Institute know about a reprint is appreciated but is not a condition of use.

This entry was archived under that permission as it stood on the date above. If the Institute's policy changes after that date, it does not apply retroactively to entries already reproduced here under the terms in effect at the time — this is a record of the grant as confirmed, not a live status check.

The original remains hosted at the Institute's own site — use the link below for the canonical version, current formatting, and any images.