On Commissions And The Fountainheads Of Reform
Governor Jay Nixon had revived a state tax-credit review commission, creating another formal process for studying a problem Missouri policymakers already understood well. The first commission had produced worthwhile recommendations, yet major reforms did not follow; lawmakers subsequently came close to approving still more large incentive packages, including Aerotropolis.
That history justified skepticism about whether another commission would matter. Study groups can assemble useful evidence, but they cannot substitute for elected officials making difficult decisions. Missouri's tax-credit system needed policymakers willing to reduce or eliminate inefficient programs, not simply another round of recommendations that could be ignored.
Participation in the commission process could still be worthwhile if it moved concrete reforms forward. The real test, however, would be legislative action rather than the production of another report.
View the original at Show-Me Institute →
As confirmed against the Show-Me Institute's website on August 15, 2026, the Institute's stated policy permits reprinting of its published articles and commentary provided the original author receives credit. Letting the Institute know about a reprint is appreciated but is not a condition of use.
This entry was archived under that permission as it stood on the date above. If the Institute's policy changes after that date, it does not apply retroactively to entries already reproduced here under the terms in effect at the time — this is a record of the grant as confirmed, not a live status check.
The original remains hosted at the Institute's own site — use the link below for the canonical version, current formatting, and any images.